Talas Mevlana Neighborhood Square,
Kayseri 2020 | Selim Atak, Cansen Molva
When examining Talas district, we notice varied building styles and public spaces that have emerged over time due to urban planning decisions of different periods. These changes can be attributed to evolving housing needs, construction techniques, and economic factors. Analyzing the public spaces in newer neighborhoods, we observe a shift in street and square layouts, with less focus on human-centric design. This has resulted in a unique urban memory with distinct breaks and definitions. In essence, the Mevlana neighborhood, relatively new and developing based on the same planning principles, stands disconnected from Talas' historical core. Placing our proposed project in an area without a direct connection to the district's collective memory would mean disregarding historical references and the process of development, essentially creating something that never existed.
Our design does not aim to establish a historical connection but rather responds to the existing architectural language. The new design for the area, nestled between buildings with dominant characteristics, should be just as assertive. The objective is for the new park and square to form their own identity, recognized not just as any park but as the central park of the Mevlana neighborhood.
The park is divided into three zones – static, dynamic, and obstructive – to ensure functionality and a sense of hierarchy among the green spaces. The architectural elements in the design give the park its new identity. The semi-open and enclosed spaces define the park and open areas. Interconnecting within the project area, these spaces form a cohesive linear building with a central circular open space that defines the heart of the park. This design accentuates seamless continuity, while also emphasizing the pivotal significance of the central area within the park.
Considering that linear paths might not fully align with human movement, minimal circulation routes have been incorporated, focusing on creating a large paved area at the center. The design aims to be perceived as a public space, not merely a corridor. To achieve this, various hard and semi-hard surfaces are employed to control the pace of movement.
Linear Mass: The building follows the alignment of existing retaining walls. The semi-open space is created at ground level, extending along the mass with varying sections. By incorporating several volumetric voids within the singular form, the design avoids repetitive spaces.
Circular Structure: The circular mass serves as an overhead canopy. It shades the activities on the hard surface below, framing the central park. This circular space is intended to be an escape for park visitors, providing a place of solitude away from the bustling city.